By 2015, the social sciences had long been a field where men and masculinity were seen as a problem to be overcome. Since the 1980s, the ‘deficit model’ of masculinity had held sway. This gloomy view of men and boys had spread from sociology to psychology, and then very quickly to governments, law and even mass culture.
Against this backdrop, back in May 2015 four psychologists presented a symposium on men’s mental health at the British Psychological Society (BPS) annual conference in Liverpool, UK. It was the first of its kind, and although Martin Seager, Roger Kingerlee, Luke Sullivan and I realised that a fresh approach to men’s mental health was needed, we had realistically modest expectations for how much we could expect to achieve from our visit to Liverpool.
“Little did we know at that time that our modest idea for a handbook would explode into a massive tome, with 32 chapters written by 50 experts from 19 organisations in 7 different countries.”
However a conversation with the people at the Palgrave Macmillan bookstand led to a discussion about the need for a book crystalising the disparate ideas about male psychology that were circulating on the edges of academia. To the great credit of Palgrave Macmillan, they were far-sighted enough to see the potential for such a book, and before long a contract was signed. Little did we know at that time that our modest idea for a handbook would explode into a massive tome, with 32 chapters written by 50 experts from 19 organisations in 7 different countries. And little did we know too how successful it would be.
Just over four years later, in March 2019, The Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology and Mental Health was published. Being the first of its kind, nobody knew what the response would be. Although around half of the content was about men’s mental health and various therapeutic approaches to helping men, the book also covered such diverse topics as aspects of masculinity, the education of boys, fatherhood, domestic abuse, health, social identity, suicide, the military, social cognition, ADHD, autism, brain injury and more. (You can see the full table of contents here).
We knew that some academics saw men as a group as privileged, and were accordingly hostile to any perceived attempts to give men extra ‘privileges’, such as empathising with men and trying to understand the causes of male suicide. However by the time we had the official book launch at UCL, with short talks by some of the Handbook authors, it was clear that the number of book sales and chapter downloads was – intriguingly - exceeding expectations.
“According to the publisher, Palgrave Macmillan, the Handbook of Male Psychology is, with over 82,000 chapter downloads and almost 100 citations, one of their “best-performing titles within the psychology list, and at Palgrave Macmillan in general””
So where are we now, nearly four years after the publication of the Handbook? Well, according to the publisher, Palgrave Macmillan, the Handbook of Male Psychology is, with over 82,000 chapter downloads and almost 100 citations, one of their “best-performing titles within the psychology list, and at Palgrave Macmillan in general”. This is no small achievement, given that Palgrave is one of the biggest publishers in the social sciences and humanities worldwide. The number of downloads represents well over 2000 books sold.
Figure 1 shows the top ten downloads. Note that 22 other chapters are not on this list, among them some very highly downloaded and respected chapters, often talked about online and at conferences and meetings.
Figure 1. The top ten most downloaded chapters of the Handbook of Male Psychology
You can see in Figure 2 the ten most cited chapters from the Handbook. The Altmetrics scores cited in the third column are a measure of how much a chapter is “discussed and used around the world” e.g. in public policy documents, blogs, mainstream media and social media.
Figure 2. Chapters of the Handbook of Male Psychology most cited, their number of downloads, and their Altmetrics scores
Figure 3 shows which countries have downloaded the most chapters in the past year. Interestingly, the figure shows there is as much interest in Germany and The Netherlands as there is in Canada. It is interesting that some smaller countries were strongly represented in the past year, though on reflection these figures make sense. For example, Lithuania was the country with the 9th largest number of downloads, but this makes sense when you realise that this is a country with one of the highest rates of male suicide rates in the world, thus a country with one of the greatest needs to understand and improve men’s mental health. (See for example this exciting development).
Figure 3. Chapter downloads of the Handbook of Male Psychology, by country in the past year.
Figure 4 shows how the Handbook compares to similar books in terms of citations (i.e. mentions of the Handbook, or Handbook chapters, in other books or journals). The bars represent books of the same Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) i.e. ‘Good Health and Well Being’, and same Field of Research (FoR).
Figure 4. Number of citations from the Handbook of Male Psychology compared to similar books.
Although there are some truly unique insights in the Handbook (e.g. Martin Seager’s concept of gamma bias), in many ways the success of the Handbook is not that it is telling us something new, but that it is reminding us of something that most of us already know to be true. As US author Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “Society is always taken by surprise at any new example of common sense”. The Handbook represents a stepping back from the ideological deficit view of masculinity, and instead and instead an exploration of male psychology not just from an objective viewpoint, but from a viewpoint that is rooted in the tradition of psychology as a science and an evidence-based therapeutic approach. It will aways have the unique place of being the first handbook that broached a topic that many could not talk about, and demonstrated how necessary these conversations are for us all to have, and how eagerly people would engage in them.
If you liked the Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology, you will want to know about, Perspectives in Male Psychology: An Introduction, which is the first BPS textbook on male psychology. It is written by Louise Liddon, one of the authors of Chapter 32 of the Handbook, and John Barry, one of the editors of the Handbook. The contents of Perspectives can be viewed here, and reviews can be viewed here.
Scroll down to join the discussion
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for therapy, legal advice, or other professional opinion. Never disregard such advice because of this article or anything else you have read from the Centre for Male Psychology. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of, or are endorsed by, The Centre for Male Psychology, and we cannot be held responsible for these views. Read our full disclaimer here.
Like our articles?
Click here to subscribe to our FREE newsletter and be first
to hear about news, events, and publications.
When a male is in a power imbalance, at least two masculine instincts are disempowered…
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Men might benefit greatly from a government strategy aimed at improving their health. Here are suggestions from the Centre for Male Psychology on how that might be done. This article ends with some comments on potential pitfalls in the process of putting this strategy in place.
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
… many papers do not even bother to identify or justify the nationality of their samples…
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Have you got something to say?
Check out our submissions page to find out how to write for us.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Much of our attitudes, theorizing and public debate around men and masculinity is influenced by high profile feminist and Gender Studies scholars in academia. But what is the scientific quality of publications from these scholars?
Some people blame drill music – a form of rap - for the rising murder rate in London. Drill is known for aggressive lyrics about gang violence, but rather than seeing this as a valuable way for young men to express their feelings, some people want to ban it.
To survive… cultures have to use men and women effectively and … in fact, most cultures have used men and women in different ways… what our culture does is [grant] greater status to men and greater protection to women
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
There are around 300,000 veterans living with hearing loss in the UK, according to The Royal British Legion. In addition to being at a greater risk of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, many vets are also battling psychological distress from hearing problems.
The book begins with a description of her therapeutic approach, and an illustration of how to understand and work with the rage often seen in male CSA clients.
I felt in my dealings with some police officers, as though I were treated firstly as a man (assumed to be a perpetrator), but they’d overlooked risks associated with my impairment. Example: How can you dodge a missile you don’t see coming?
The Panorama programme on domestic violence failed to adequately highlight two important issues: male victims and female perpetrators.
your photograph, name and address, might appear in the local and national press and on TV, insinuating what an evil monster you are
…an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. …What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack?
The male has been designed to “look”, not only at the female, but to “look out” for prey, for danger, and for ways to protect his family unit.
If his child is allowed to live, this man must be available, for the rest of his life, to love and provide for his child… If, on the other hand, it is decided that his child is to be destroyed, he should be able to go about his life as if nothing has happened
Socialising is a basic human need. The opposite – social isolation – is one of the worst forms of torture. Some people look down on the local pub as a place for undesirable riff raff, but that narrow viewpoint misses entirely the community value of the pub
Male psychology is a recent development in academia. Unlike gender studies, feminism, and men’s studies, male psychology takes the view that we can gain more by recognising and harnessing the positive aspects of masculinity than we can by taking a relentlessly negative approach to men.
.
