Challenging misleading information in the House of Lords about domestic abuse
It is not new or surprising that falsehoods and lies are spread in the political landscape, especially when it comes to ‘gendered’ issues. During the reading stages of the Online Safety Bill it was claimed repeatedly in the House of Lords that "women are 27 times more likely than men to be harassed online". Baroness Newlove said in this debate: ”I thank Barnardo’s, the NSPCC, Refuge and the Centre for Women’s Justice for their briefing. My interest will be in the work and roles of the Victims’ Commissioner and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner, and the code of practice to protect the VAWG sector in light of women being 27 times more likely to be abused and harassed.” Baroness Grey-Thompson added: “I would like to concentrate on violence against women and girls, and I thank all the women who have been in touch with me. We must recognise the threat that women are under. Women are 27 times more likely to experience abuse—that is one in three women.”
How is it possible that intelligent, highly educated members of the House of Lords spread such misinformation while creating a bill that is meant to address ‘misinformation’?
It is possible, because a feminist online campaign, specifically created to lobby for a gendered version of the Online Safety Bill, presented the Lords with inaccurate information. On their website, they promote the claim that ‘women are 27 times more likely than men to be harassed online’. As reference, they point to ‘European Women’s Lobby (2017) Her Net Her Rights – Mapping the state of online violence against women and girls in Europe’. The ‘27’ claim can indeed be found in the document, but with no reference to research.
We (GenderParityUK) knew this number to be false, since we had looked into research on online abuse before and had discovered that men experience slightly higher levels of online abuse.
We wrote a detailed letter to all Lords and Baronesses who participated in the Online Safety Bill Debate, in which we made them aware of the falsehood of the ‘27’ claim and provided them with actual research. The email was sent to over 40 members of the House of Lords. The precise number of responses was: Zero. We resent the email after 2 weeks and received the same result. Frustrated due to the lack of accountability we decided to contact the Office for Statistics Regulation. This government body has ‘helped’ the Men’s Rights Movement before on at least two occasions, because they actually seem to care about research without ideological bias.
“[…] this statistic has been used several times in the House of Commons and House of Lords in discussions about the Online Safety Bill. […] The original source of the statistic is a 2015 UN Broadband Commission report [which] was withdrawn by the UN Broadband Commission shortly after publication, due to concerns about the quality of the analysis in the report.”
In our letter we made them aware of the use of unsupported statistics and provided them with research disproving the false claim.
The Office for Statistics Regulator published their response on their website.
"Thank you for contacting us with your concerns about the claim that “women are 27 times more likely than men to be harassed online”. As you pointed out, this statistic has been used several times in the House of Commons and House of Lords in discussions about the Online Safety Bill.
The claim is based on an external research report rather than official statistics. [...]
The original source of the statistic is a 2015 UN Broadband Commission report, Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls: A Worldwide Wake-Up Call. However, the source most commonly cited is a 2017 report and resource pack, Her Net Her Rights, produced by the European Women’s Lobby, which references the UN report.
We were not able to properly scrutinise the statistic because it is our understanding that the UN report was withdrawn by the UN Broadband Commission shortly after publication, due to concerns about the quality of the analysis in the report. The UN Broadband Commission replaced the report with a short executive summary with the key findings of the research, but this does not contain the ‘27 times’ claim.”
‘Armed’ with this public statement of the Office for Statistics Regulatior we have now contacted the sponsors of the bill, MP Michelle Donelan and Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay. We are yet to receive a response to our complaint and would encourage you, the reader, to contact them as well and all those who continue to spread this misinformation.
It would be naive to call the public response of the Regulator a victory, but is a small step in the right direction.
Scroll down to join the discussion
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for therapy, legal advice, or other professional opinion. Never disregard such advice because of this article or anything else you have read from the Centre for Male Psychology. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of, or are endorsed by, The Centre for Male Psychology, and we cannot be held responsible for these views. Read our full disclaimer here.
Like our articles?
Click here to subscribe to our FREE newsletter and be first
to hear about news, events, and publications.
When a male is in a power imbalance, at least two masculine instincts are disempowered…
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Men might benefit greatly from a government strategy aimed at improving their health. Here are suggestions from the Centre for Male Psychology on how that might be done. This article ends with some comments on potential pitfalls in the process of putting this strategy in place.
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
… many papers do not even bother to identify or justify the nationality of their samples…
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
There is social power, there is structural power, and there is physical power. What women have in our society is the power of the state behind them, and men do not. Men only have that physical power, and most men don’t want to use it
people are more aware of the fact men can be victims of this type of violence, but this often isn’t translated into policy, practice or indeed provision of resources
Therapists can work effectively with men experiencing distress without asking them to change. Telling them they are ‘doing masculinity wrong’ is judgemental and victim blaming.
people are more aware of the fact men can be victims of this type of violence, but this often isn’t translated into policy, practice or indeed provision of resources
people are more aware of the fact men can be victims of this type of violence, but this often isn’t translated into policy, practice or indeed provision of resources
Have you got something to say?
Check out our submissions page to find out how to write for us.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Much of our attitudes, theorizing and public debate around men and masculinity is influenced by high profile feminist and Gender Studies scholars in academia. But what is the scientific quality of publications from these scholars?
Some people blame drill music – a form of rap - for the rising murder rate in London. Drill is known for aggressive lyrics about gang violence, but rather than seeing this as a valuable way for young men to express their feelings, some people want to ban it.
To survive… cultures have to use men and women effectively and … in fact, most cultures have used men and women in different ways… what our culture does is [grant] greater status to men and greater protection to women
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
There are around 300,000 veterans living with hearing loss in the UK, according to The Royal British Legion. In addition to being at a greater risk of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, many vets are also battling psychological distress from hearing problems.
The book begins with a description of her therapeutic approach, and an illustration of how to understand and work with the rage often seen in male CSA clients.
I felt in my dealings with some police officers, as though I were treated firstly as a man (assumed to be a perpetrator), but they’d overlooked risks associated with my impairment. Example: How can you dodge a missile you don’t see coming?
The Panorama programme on domestic violence failed to adequately highlight two important issues: male victims and female perpetrators.
your photograph, name and address, might appear in the local and national press and on TV, insinuating what an evil monster you are
…an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. …What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack?
The male has been designed to “look”, not only at the female, but to “look out” for prey, for danger, and for ways to protect his family unit.
If his child is allowed to live, this man must be available, for the rest of his life, to love and provide for his child… If, on the other hand, it is decided that his child is to be destroyed, he should be able to go about his life as if nothing has happened
Socialising is a basic human need. The opposite – social isolation – is one of the worst forms of torture. Some people look down on the local pub as a place for undesirable riff raff, but that narrow viewpoint misses entirely the community value of the pub
Male psychology is a recent development in academia. Unlike gender studies, feminism, and men’s studies, male psychology takes the view that we can gain more by recognising and harnessing the positive aspects of masculinity than we can by taking a relentlessly negative approach to men.
.
Philipp Tanzer
Philipp Tanzer (45) was born in Germany and moved to Scotland in 2012. He has been an active member of the Men's Rights Movement since 2018. The BBC followed him in their short documentary "I am a Men's Right's Activist" and he has been a guest on podcast such as the Lotus Eaters. He founded the organisation GenderParityUK in 2020. He is married and has a daughter named Hope.