Picture: Male Psychology Network Conference 2016 at UCL
Imagine going to a talk about male psychology at a top university, given by an expert on the subject. Imagine also that the event is free, is in a distinguished and pleasant location that’s easy to get to. Furthermore, imagine the other people attending the talk are some of the most informed, intelligent and fun people you have ever met, and they want you to join them afterwards at a nearby pub for a couple of hours of food, drink and lively conversation. Well that, dear reader, is what we did for five years at University College London (UCL) as the Male Psychology Network (MPN, forerunner of the Centre for Male Psychology), until covid restrictions made organising such events impossible. But has covid finished us off? Before talking about what the future holds, let me first tell you about the glory days.
Up until early 2020, every couple of months we put on an event, which could be a free talk by an expert, a workshop, debate, movie, or book launch. We put on talks on topics that other venues dared not. We had a range of expert speakers on topics in male psychology, including an ethnography of incels by Dr Rob Whitley of McGill University, Canada, in 2019 (who also gave an excellent lecture on victim blaming in 2018); gamma bias theory in 2018 by Martin Seager & I (our 2019 animation is here); Prevention of child sexual abuse by Dr Sarah Goode (University of Winchester); an brilliant talk by Glen Poole (Australian Men’s Health Forum) on the social determinants of male suicide in the UK compared to Australia; in October 2016 the highly respected Prof Gijsbert Stoet (then of University of Glasgow) addressed the question ‘are boys failing in school or are schools failing boys?’
One of the most popular was the talk in Feb 2019 by Margaret Gardener, Director of False Allegations Support Organisation (FASO), on the psychological aspects of false allegations of sexual abuse, the video of which has been viewed 21,000 times (at time of writing). There have been a lots of genuinely orginal presentations, too many to list in full here.
Our first debate was in May 2017, on the motion that masculinity is not toxic. Arguing against the motion were Leila Wildsmith (Regents College London), Phil Price (Domestic Violence Intervention Project) and Michael Conroy (A Call To Men UK). Arguing for the motion were psychosexual therapist H Eli Joubert (University of Surrey), Naomi Murphy (HMPS Whitemoor) and Martin Seager (Central London Samaritans). The audience at the debate voted both before and after they heard the arguments and ultimately the motion was carried with a narrow majority. The debate can be seen here.
The second debate was in Dec 2017 on the motion 'this house believes that masculinity is not simply a social construct' (see a clip of the debate here). The panelists for the motion: Dr Brenda Todd, Developmental Psychologist (City University London), Dr H Eli Joubert (University of Surrey), and Dr Becci Owens (University of Sunderland). Against the motion were: Leila Wildsmith (Regents University London), Martin Tod (Chief Executive, Men’s Heath Forum, UK) and Dr Ben Hine (University of West London). The chair was Martin Daubney, award winning journalist. Despite Martin Tod being a former contender in the World Debating Championships, the motion was carried through, though not without some impromptu debate about whether the motion was framed in an inconsistent way which impacted the outcome e.g. it was advertised on Eventbrite as ‘Is Santa sexist if he gives your son a robot?’
Our third debate was ‘the debate that never was’, because we couldn’t find anyone to argue against the motion that the APA and PTMF guidelines on male psychology should be rejected.
We showed two films: Welcome to the Men’s Group, with an introduction and Q&A by the lead actor and director, Joseph Culp, in June 2016. We also showed the legendary The Red Pill, directed by and starring Cassie Jaye, which was shown twice, first by the (now defunct) Gender Equity Network in Dec 2016, and secondly by the MPN in Jan 2017. We also hosted the launch of the seminal Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology and Mental Health with presentations from several of the chapter authors, including Prof Kenneth Gannon (University of East London), Dr Nathan Hook, Belinda Brown (UCL), June Brown (Kings College London), Martin Seager, and John Barry.
We also had an annual conference, which started as a one-day event in 2014, and from 2015 onwards became a two-day event. I won’t say much here about the conferences because they are covered in some detail here, except to note that they got bigger and better each year, and never lost their hallmark atmosphere of infectious friendly enthusiasm.
The final talk at UCL – although we didn’t know it at the time - was in December 2019, and the final external event we were involved with was at the University of Strathclyde, Scotland, on 11th March 2020. The Strathclyde event happened just before the first UK lockdown, and in fact it came very close to being cancelled. The talk went ahead, but my family and I had a difficult time getting back home due to travel restrictions, and had to hire a car for the return journey because the train timetable had become so unpredictable.
It's a cliché to say that you don’t appreciate what you have until you lose it, but this just proves how true cliches can be. For many regulars to our events, the JZ Young Lecture Theatre – where our events started out and where most of the conferences and talks took place – holds many good memories, and after two years of absence, some nostalgia. The same is true of the local bar where ideas and drinks flowed in equal measure, especially in the warmer weather when we could sit at the tables outside. The speakers and attendees talked freely with each other, sometimes resulting in new ideas and even new collaborations.
If you were lucky enough to be there, other events you might have seen were: sociologist Dr Rob Hadley on how men ageing without family become invisible and alienated, consultant psychotherapist Andrew Briggs on the importance of fathers to mental health, US psychiatrist Dr Paul Dobransky on how to help men have more enduring relationships and greater job satisfaction, Stuart Hontree on parental alienation (on two occasions), Dr Sarah Goode on prevention of child sexual abuse, Anil Kumar (coaching in India) on compassion when working with men in distress, Tam Roper and John Barry on the mental health benefits of a visit to the barber, consultant clinical psychologist Martin Seager and John Barry on sex differences in the needs of therapy clients, and Martin Seager and John Barry on male gender blindness. On a technical note, I should confess that although we recorded the events, the sound quality was pretty bad up to 2018 (I am no Stanley Kubric), but from 2019 Anthony Cornish of Good Man Gone Productions began to help with our A/V and the quality improved considerably.
When are we going to resume our in-person events? Sign up here to our newsletter and be the first to find out! Not only are we coming back with in-person events, we are extending our reach with online events, which is great news for our supporters in North America, Australia, Spain, Germany, South America and the other places we know are interested in what we do. I for one am certainly looking forward to the next time, and hope you can join us, and make the events bigger and better than ever.
Scroll down to join the discussion
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for therapy, legal advice, or other professional opinion. Never disregard such advice because of this article or anything else you have read from the Centre for Male Psychology. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of, or are endorsed by, The Centre for Male Psychology, and we cannot be held responsible for these views. Read our full disclaimer here.
Like our articles?
Click here to subscribe to our FREE newsletter and be first
to hear about news, events, and publications.
people are more aware of the fact men can be victims of this type of violence, but this often isn’t translated into policy, practice or indeed provision of resources
When a male is in a power imbalance, at least two masculine instincts are disempowered…
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Men might benefit greatly from a government strategy aimed at improving their health. Here are suggestions from the Centre for Male Psychology on how that might be done. This article ends with some comments on potential pitfalls in the process of putting this strategy in place.
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
… many papers do not even bother to identify or justify the nationality of their samples…
Have you got something to say?
Check out our submissions page to find out how to write for us.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Much of our attitudes, theorizing and public debate around men and masculinity is influenced by high profile feminist and Gender Studies scholars in academia. But what is the scientific quality of publications from these scholars?
Some people blame drill music – a form of rap - for the rising murder rate in London. Drill is known for aggressive lyrics about gang violence, but rather than seeing this as a valuable way for young men to express their feelings, some people want to ban it.
To survive… cultures have to use men and women effectively and … in fact, most cultures have used men and women in different ways… what our culture does is [grant] greater status to men and greater protection to women
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
There are around 300,000 veterans living with hearing loss in the UK, according to The Royal British Legion. In addition to being at a greater risk of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, many vets are also battling psychological distress from hearing problems.
The book begins with a description of her therapeutic approach, and an illustration of how to understand and work with the rage often seen in male CSA clients.
I felt in my dealings with some police officers, as though I were treated firstly as a man (assumed to be a perpetrator), but they’d overlooked risks associated with my impairment. Example: How can you dodge a missile you don’t see coming?
The Panorama programme on domestic violence failed to adequately highlight two important issues: male victims and female perpetrators.
your photograph, name and address, might appear in the local and national press and on TV, insinuating what an evil monster you are
…an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. …What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack?
The male has been designed to “look”, not only at the female, but to “look out” for prey, for danger, and for ways to protect his family unit.
If his child is allowed to live, this man must be available, for the rest of his life, to love and provide for his child… If, on the other hand, it is decided that his child is to be destroyed, he should be able to go about his life as if nothing has happened
Socialising is a basic human need. The opposite – social isolation – is one of the worst forms of torture. Some people look down on the local pub as a place for undesirable riff raff, but that narrow viewpoint misses entirely the community value of the pub
Male psychology is a recent development in academia. Unlike gender studies, feminism, and men’s studies, male psychology takes the view that we can gain more by recognising and harnessing the positive aspects of masculinity than we can by taking a relentlessly negative approach to men.
.
