It is not manly to whinge, for whinging comes too close to self-pity which is a corrosive habit.
I say this as someone who has done a great deal of what might be called whinging (in writing), albeit on behalf of male humans in general, not myself.
The modern whinge is victimhood. I would be mortified if my oeuvre on male disadvantages were misinterpreted as a play in the victimhood Olympics. It is by no means a bad thing that men are disqualified from entry into those regrettable games.
Being a man is not easy nowadays, people say. A man never knows what is expected of him anymore, apparently.
Really? Are you sure? And when was it ever easy?
Admittedly, when it is the nature of masculinity itself which is the unscrupulous means of attack, one may be forgiven for being wrong-footed, initially.
“…one must admit that this attack [on traditional masculinity] is to be preferred to being shot at.”
Whatever the broader implications of the attempt to undermine traditional masculinity, as far as the immediate impact upon an individual is concerned one must admit that this attack is to be preferred to being shot at. More significantly, it is to be preferred to working 12-plus hour days, six days per week, at labour so hard that most modern men would wilt after a hour or two of it. We are no longer digging 4,000 miles of canals and 20,000 miles of railroads by hand with picks and shovels. Our engineering feats are just as impressive, but it is machines which do the heavy lifting now. Let us have some perspective. It was never easy being a man.
The rational counter to the false narrative about masculinity is important and must continue. The benefit of the empirical approach is not that it provides a means of convincing the sceptic (lamentably) but rather that it provides objective justification for the moral probity of a position taken in defence of the truths thus established.
The empirical approach readily uncovers the all-pervading disadvantages men suffer – many of them of ancient lineage. More recently these disadvantages have been seriously exacerbated by partisan actions. The implacable undermining of fatherhood and the eradication of respect for men are perhaps the two most egregious. These things, and many more, have been imposed upon men from without – by society and the State. They do not result from inherent flaws in masculinity, but rather masculinity is made the scapegoat: denigration was ever the handmaiden of discrimination.
“…an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. …What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack?”
What, then, to do about it? Undoubtedly there are myriad matters practical and political to be addressed, but these difficult problems are not our concern here. Our concern is with matters psychological. This is more than usually important because an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. It is systemic psychic aggression.
What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack? Empirical truths, crucial in establishing moral validity and rational understanding, are nevertheless powerless to effect a remedy against this psychological aggression. What, then, is the remedy?
If the problem is the destruction of a stable identity, then the cure is to re-establish a stable identity.
This cannot be done by inventing an arbitrary persona and attempting to force your self into an unnatural shape. Mental health involves being comfortable within your own skin, and your skin knows its own mind, so to speak. The malleability of a product of millennia of evolution is limited. A stable identity is best constructed around its natural, traditional core.
Respect for men has been badly eroded, and this is, perhaps, the most serious of the problems. To reverse the trend, demanding respect will not work. Respect must be inspired by behaviour.
Do we truly not know what is expected of us anymore?
Everyone knows what it is to be a man. “Be a man” is an exhortation which is understood - QED.
If this is not sufficient, then simply equate “man” with “gentleman”. You know what that means without explanation. (Victorian associations with men of independent financial means can be jettisoned now – as can any implications regarding class). Here are some clues if that is not enough: the primacy of integrity, being undemonstrative, modest, mannerly – even courteous – and striving to be virtuous. You may opine that these should equally apply to women. I would agree. But there are different obligations upon men and women. For women there is the little matter of having the monopoly of the means by which the human race can perpetuate, which is a weighty obligation indeed and may not be a welcome one for some. On the other hand, men are expected to perform in order to be men. Women are human beings, men are human doings. Men cannot rest upon their laurels but need constantly to renew their claim to manhood, or it will lapse with their last failure.
The asymmetry between the sexes is stark in the matter of parenthood. A woman’s status as mother is assured by biology. But it takes society, culture and legislature to make fatherhood.
You may demur on the grounds that this is palpably unfair. Yes, it is. Get used to it. Getting used to it is part of being a man – and a woman. And in so doing you will necessarily accept that the genders are different.
Another objection is that this advice hardly helps with genuine, and serious, disadvantages imposed upon a man – such as being sundered from his children without due cause, or being locked up in prison for something he did not do. Quite true, “being a man” does not assist with such practical problems, which are within the realm of lobbying and politics. You can be the greatest paragon and still be treated abominably by a system and culture which has become seriously discriminatory. There are, however, things that younger men can do to reduce the likelihood of ending up in such a position. Part of being a man is, after all, to exercise judgment and prudence. Here’s one example:
You are not obliged to associate socially with those whose company will be degrading.
There is nothing aggressive about this, and it is best to avoid explicit explanation as far as possible. The message lies in the action.
Your aims should be integrity, self-respect and the respect of others, plus a conscious commitment to the personal virtues. My thesis is that these are the cornerstones of mental health.
The temptation is to react to the male disadvantages – especially those amplified by the State and by individuals for personal advantage – with anger. It is known in some quarters as “red-pill rage”. As a temporary condition it may be unavoidable. But it is necessary to move beyond it, because it is a destructive condition. The temptation to adopt a disparaging attitude to life in general takes you further away from your goal of being a man, and actually plays into the hands of the critics of men and masculinity. Maintaining a courteous attitude towards women, for example, elevates you rather than belittles you. And it does not (necessarily) imply any desire for intimacy.
Whether young men might wish to engage in marriage, cohabitation or fathering children is a practical matter upon which they deserve to be informed as regards the quantifiable risks involved – and then to decide for themselves. But “being a man” is their first and higher duty, to themselves and to others.
Scroll down to join the discussion
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for therapy, legal advice, or other professional opinion. Never disregard such advice because of this article or anything else you have read from the Centre for Male Psychology. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of, or are endorsed by, The Centre for Male Psychology, and we cannot be held responsible for these views. Read our full disclaimer here.
Like our articles?
Click here to subscribe to our FREE newsletter and be first
to hear about news, events, and publications.
people are more aware of the fact men can be victims of this type of violence, but this often isn’t translated into policy, practice or indeed provision of resources
When a male is in a power imbalance, at least two masculine instincts are disempowered…
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Men might benefit greatly from a government strategy aimed at improving their health. Here are suggestions from the Centre for Male Psychology on how that might be done. This article ends with some comments on potential pitfalls in the process of putting this strategy in place.
…people – men and women alike – respond less positively to male-favouring sex differences than they do to female-favouring sex differences.
… many papers do not even bother to identify or justify the nationality of their samples…
Have you got something to say?
Check out our submissions page to find out how to write for us.
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
Much of our attitudes, theorizing and public debate around men and masculinity is influenced by high profile feminist and Gender Studies scholars in academia. But what is the scientific quality of publications from these scholars?
Some people blame drill music – a form of rap - for the rising murder rate in London. Drill is known for aggressive lyrics about gang violence, but rather than seeing this as a valuable way for young men to express their feelings, some people want to ban it.
To survive… cultures have to use men and women effectively and … in fact, most cultures have used men and women in different ways… what our culture does is [grant] greater status to men and greater protection to women
hyper-masculine gender norms are typically embedded within military institutions, and while adherence to these norms can contribute to combat and military success, they conversely make clinical work challenging
There are around 300,000 veterans living with hearing loss in the UK, according to The Royal British Legion. In addition to being at a greater risk of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, many vets are also battling psychological distress from hearing problems.
The book begins with a description of her therapeutic approach, and an illustration of how to understand and work with the rage often seen in male CSA clients.
I felt in my dealings with some police officers, as though I were treated firstly as a man (assumed to be a perpetrator), but they’d overlooked risks associated with my impairment. Example: How can you dodge a missile you don’t see coming?
The Panorama programme on domestic violence failed to adequately highlight two important issues: male victims and female perpetrators.
your photograph, name and address, might appear in the local and national press and on TV, insinuating what an evil monster you are
…an attack upon masculinity is an attack upon one’s sense of self, of identity. …What, then, is the right psychological defence against such an attack?
The male has been designed to “look”, not only at the female, but to “look out” for prey, for danger, and for ways to protect his family unit.
If his child is allowed to live, this man must be available, for the rest of his life, to love and provide for his child… If, on the other hand, it is decided that his child is to be destroyed, he should be able to go about his life as if nothing has happened
Socialising is a basic human need. The opposite – social isolation – is one of the worst forms of torture. Some people look down on the local pub as a place for undesirable riff raff, but that narrow viewpoint misses entirely the community value of the pub
Male psychology is a recent development in academia. Unlike gender studies, feminism, and men’s studies, male psychology takes the view that we can gain more by recognising and harnessing the positive aspects of masculinity than we can by taking a relentlessly negative approach to men.
.
